Campaign 285 - Lewes and Evesham 1264-65. Simon de Montfort and the Barons’ War (2015).pdf

(13704 KB) Pobierz
© Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com
CAMPAIGN 285
LEWES AND EVESHAM
1264–65 
Simon de Montfort and the Barons' War
RICHARD BROOKS
ILLUSTRATED BY GRAHAM TURNER
 
Series editor Marcus Cowper
© Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
CHRONOLOGY
OPPOSING COMMANDERS
Royalist commanders
n
Baronial commanders
4
7
8
OPPOSING FORCES
Royalist forces
n
Baronial forces
12
OPPOSING PLANS
Royalist plans
n
Baronial plans
18
THE LEWES CAMPAIGN
The capture of Northampton
n
The siege of Rochester
n
The King’s march to Lewes
n
Lewes and its
surroundings
n
Prelude to battle
n
The battlefield
n
Numbers and dispositions
n
The Wretched Battle
of Lewes
23
THE CAMPAIGN OF EVESHAM
Renewed hostilities
n
The Younger Simon’s campaign
n
The Kenilworth raid
n
The field of battle
n
The
Royalist approach
n
Earl Simon’s death ride
n
The Mordre of Evesham
63
AFTER THE BATTLE
THE BATTLEFIELDS TODAY
FURTHER READING
GLOSSARY
INDEX
88
91
93
94
95
© Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com
INTRODUCTION
The battles of Lewes and Evesham, fought in May 1264 and August 1265,
were a shocking departure from the political norms of the day. The reign of
Henry III (1216–72) was generally peaceful. English wars occurred in Wales
or overseas, in England’s last Continental possession, Gascony. The last time
English knights met in pitched battle on English soil was at Lincoln in 1217,
when Henry was a boy of ten.
If Henry’s reign was peaceful, it was hardly satisfactory. The conflict
known as the Second Barons’ War of 1264–65, to distinguish it from the
events of 1215–17, arose from longstanding political grievances. A pious and
cultured man, Henry III was a feckless and divisive king. He obstinately
defended his right to govern, while failing to do so effectively, or to engage
the support of his natural counsellors, the baronial elite which controlled the
country’s landed wealth. Instead, he favoured a succession of foreign
adventurers, first the relatives of his wife, Eleanor of Provence, then his
Lusignan half-brothers from Poitou, born of Henry’s mother’s second marriage.
Knightly battle depicted in
La
estoire de St Aedward le rei:
contrary to received images of
the Middle Ages, such extremes
of violence were rare in 13th-
century England. (MS Ee.3.59
f.32v by kind permission of the
Syndics of Cambridge
University Library)
4
© Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com
The English crown was not rich, and these aliens were resented as
intruders, who absorbed rents, lands and ecclesiastical benefices that rightly
belonged to native-born Englishmen. The Lusignans’ greedy and violent
behaviour outraged a burgeoning sense of English identity. All classes shared
a distrust of foreigners bordering on xenophobia. New ideas were developing
about a community of the realm, no longer limited to the nobility, which
distinguished between kings who ruled for the good of their people, and
tyrants who did not.
Henry’s personal rule might have been more popular had it been more
successful. The Poitou campaign of 1242 was a fiasco, amply justifying the
English belief that ‘Poitevin’ meant ‘traitor’. Henry’s efforts to restrain the
unconquered Welsh were hesitant and sometimes disastrous. In 1257 the men
of Ystrad Tywi destroyed an English army near Carmarthen leaving several
thousand dead, including its commander. A wild scheme to place Henry’s
second son Edmund on the throne of Sicily was an expensive and embarrassing
failure. Royal justices and sheriffs responsible for local administration were
considered venal and oppressive,
seeking to extract taxes from a
countryside racked by famine simply
to sustain pointless foreign adventures.
Baronial dissatisfaction with royal
misgovernment overflowed in 1258. A
parliament of barons and senior
churchmen held at Oxford subjected
Henry to a counsel nominated by a
panel of lay and ecclesiastical
magnates. They reduced the king to a
cypher, unable to issue writs or charters
without their consent. The
revolutionary Provisions of Oxford
were followed by the Provisions of
Westminster addressing judicial
abuses. The Lusignans were expelled,
and offices such as the custodianship
of royal castles were restricted
to Englishmen.
Henry’s subjection to baronial
oversight was unsustainable. The
magnates split between reformers and
conservatives, and in 1261 Henry
reasserted his freedom with support
from the Pope and 500 knights paid by
Henry’s brother-in-law, Louis IX of
France. The only magnate left to
defend the Provisions was Simon de
Montfort, Earl of Leicester. Rather
than break his oath he left England,
but returned two years later after
further dissension. Simon reimposed
the Provisions, but his faction was too
weak to dominate an unwilling king.
Henry III’s main interests were
artistic. His greatest
achievement was rebuilding
Westminster Abbey, where he
is commemorated by this early
14th-century painting in the
Sedilia. (Copyright Dean and
Chapter Westminster)
5
© Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin